Course record SOCY

SOCY 2061

Introduction to Social Statistics

University of Colorado Boulder

1,878 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 21

Ryan Kelly Masters 515 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
53.0% A
25.0% B
12.8% C
2.9% D
6.2% F

515 letter grades

Compare with the course
Masters vs. the course average
A +8.7
B −6.8
C −2.4
D same
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

7.2% withdrew · 40 of 555 enrolled.

Amanda Jean Stevenson 928 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
48.5% A
30.7% B
11.3% C
3.3% D
6.1% F

928 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stevenson vs. the course average
A +4.1
B −1.2
C −3.9
D +0.4
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 34 of 962 enrolled.

Jason D Boardman 435 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
25.3% A
42.5% B
26.2% C
2.1% D
3.9% F

435 letter grades

Compare with the course
Boardman vs. the course average
A −19.1
B +10.6
C +11.0
D −0.9
F −1.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 26 of 461 enrolled.

Trent Davidson 42 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.00
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.59
Reflection4.43
Respect4.59
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.36
Questions4.70
Hannah Lyden 133 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

133 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.34
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.38
Reflection4.55
Respect4.86
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.42
Questions4.66
Katherine Ann Craig 56 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.71
Synthesis2.65
Collaboration2.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.51
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.30
Reflection3.40
Respect4.20
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.45
Challenge3.50
Questions2.86
Rivers Ryan Isaacson 52 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.38
Connection3.82
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.33
Reflection4.41
Respect4.52
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.04
Questions4.42
Laura R Patterson 68 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

68 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.83
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.91
Reflection4.96
Respect4.97
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.97
Jennifer Jewel Tostlebe 11 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Ashley Myrtle Blinkhorn 17 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.97
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration3.33
Connection3.73
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.33
Grading3.83
Reflection3.97
Respect4.23
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.77
Questions4.17
Show all 21 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.