Course record SLHS

SLHS 4714

Audiological Rehabilitation

University of Colorado Boulder

323 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score73/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 11

Hannah Anneli Glick 75 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
88.0% A
9.3% B
2.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

75 letter grades

Compare with the course
Glick vs. the course average
A +11.5
B −10.8
C −0.4
D same
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 1 of 76 enrolled.

Carmela A L Fay 60 grades · 1 term 3.78GPA
83.3% A
16.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

60 letter grades

Compare with the course
Fay vs. the course average
A +6.9
B −3.5
C −3.1
D same
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 60 enrolled.

Kerry A Walker 45 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
77.8% A
22.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

45 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walker vs. the course average
A +1.3
B +2.1
C −3.1
D same
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 45 enrolled.

Elizabeth Caldwell Langer 84 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
66.7% A
29.8% B
3.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

84 letter grades

Compare with the course
Langer vs. the course average
A −9.8
B +9.6
C +0.5
D same
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.2% withdrew · 1 of 85 enrolled.

Angela Yarnell Bonino 59 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
67.8% A
22.0% B
8.5% C
0.0% D
1.7% F

59 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bonino vs. the course average
A −8.7
B +1.9
C +5.4
D same
F +1.4

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 1 of 60 enrolled.

Elizabeth Buckley Mcnichols 45 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.72
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect4.92
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.78
Questions4.88
Elizabeth Catherine Caldwell 33 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Heather Lyn Hurlbut 29 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Peyton Charis Mills 16 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Olivia Ruggiano 70 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

70 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.78
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.82
Questions4.88
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.