Course record SLHS
SLHS 4704
Audiological Evaluation
University of Colorado Boulder
320 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Rachael Rebecca Baiduc 91 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Baiduc vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
−4.6
C
−0.3
D
−0.3
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 2 of 93 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.78
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.86
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.78
Questions4.87
Anu Sharma 79 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
79 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sharma vs. the course average
A
+6.5
B
−3.8
C
−4.0
D
+1.0
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.91
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.50
Reflection4.87
Respect4.88
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.89
Questions4.85
Hannah Anneli Glick 43 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Glick vs. the course average
A
−9.6
B
+15.3
C
−4.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Lauren Marie Pontis 41 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pontis vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−7.1
C
+3.1
D
−0.3
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 1 of 42 enrolled.
Laura Lynn Campos 34 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campos vs. the course average
A
−7.2
B
−3.0
C
+11.5
D
−0.3
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 34 enrolled.
Overall3.80 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.40
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.60
Questions4.20
Elizabeth Buckley Mcnichols 32 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcnichols vs. the course average
A
−16.2
B
+14.1
C
+0.3
D
−0.3
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Amy Elizabeth Tian Sanders 75 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.53
Contribution3.78
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.12
Reflection4.33
Respect4.75
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.26
Questions4.41
Jennifer Ellen Weber 78 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.73
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.86
Reflection4.61
Respect4.74
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.61
Questions4.69
Lauren Marie Durkee 18 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Hannah Sake 49 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.80
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.63
Reflection4.91
Respect4.95
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.88
Questions4.62
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.