Course record SLHS

SLHS 4560

Language Development

University of Colorado Boulder

413 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 11

Karen Lynch 94 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
85.1% A
11.7% B
3.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

94 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lynch vs. the course average
A +18.5
B −14.0
C −2.1
D −0.7
F −1.7

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 1 of 95 enrolled.

Jack S Damico 129 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
57.4% A
29.5% B
9.3% C
2.3% D
1.6% F

129 letter grades

Compare with the course
Damico vs. the course average
A −9.2
B +3.8
C +4.0
D +1.6
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 4 of 133 enrolled.

Christina Nicole Meyers 190 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
63.7% A
30.0% B
3.7% C
0.0% D
2.6% F

190 letter grades

Compare with the course
Meyers vs. the course average
A −2.9
B +4.3
C −1.6
D −0.7
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 3 of 193 enrolled.

Amanda Michelle Brignola 2 reported responses 1.85Eval / 5
Overall1.85 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection3.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion1.00
Inclusivity2.50
Grading1.00
Reflection3.50
Respect2.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge1.00
Questions3.00
Heather Lyn Hurlbut 28 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.98
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.78
Reflection4.67
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.65
Questions4.82
Donna Marie Boudreau 46 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.64
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.68
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.00
Reflection4.48
Respect4.50
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.17
Questions3.62
Vincent Emile Salazar 18 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Stephanie L Navarrete 15 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Ashley Duran-Sandoval 43 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.62
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.15
Reflection4.27
Respect4.65
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.37
Questions4.50
Tyler Reed Carson 11 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.