Course record SLHS
SLHS 3106
Hearing Science
University of Colorado Boulder
359 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Elizabeth Buckley Mcnichols 44 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcnichols vs. the course average
A
+13.5
B
−6.5
C
−4.2
D
−1.4
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Kathryn H Arehart 225 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
225 letter grades
Compare with the course
Arehart vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
+1.0
C
+1.3
D
+0.4
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 7 of 232 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.79
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.79
Reflection4.75
Respect4.74
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.74
Questions4.83
Hannah Anneli Glick 90 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
90 letter grades
Compare with the course
Glick vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
+0.7
C
−1.2
D
−0.3
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 2 of 92 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
187 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.79
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.81
Reflection4.81
Respect4.92
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.97
Questions4.77
Katherine Rose Lemons 92 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.76
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.74
Reflection4.80
Respect4.91
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.86
Questions4.91
Courtney Connolly 22 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Mckenna Wisch 56 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.88
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.72
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.80
Questions4.88
Donghyeon Yun 83 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.26
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.67
Connection3.70
Contribution3.71
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.14
Grading3.86
Reflection4.04
Respect4.43
Creativity3.66
Feedback3.33
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.00
Questions4.24
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.