Course record SLHS
SLHS 2325
American Sign Language 3
University of Colorado Boulder
366 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Paige Joy Hawkins 34 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hawkins vs. the course average
A
+6.6
B
−6.8
C
+3.3
D
−0.9
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.53
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.38
Reflection4.55
Respect4.79
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.46
Questions4.71
Audra Joan Mccorkle-Geng 87 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
87 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mccorkle-Geng vs. the course average
A
+12.6
B
−14.2
C
+0.7
D
+0.8
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 88 enrolled.
Willard Lee Moers 93 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
93 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moers vs. the course average
A
−10.0
B
+14.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 93 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.82
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.01
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.01
Karen Sue Boyd 123 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boyd vs. the course average
A
−5.6
B
+1.4
C
+2.1
D
+0.2
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 123 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.74
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.36
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.67
Reflection4.48
Respect4.77
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.59
Arlene M Gunderson 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.61GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 11 enrolled.
Overall3.14 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.30
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.00
Questions1.70
Rachel G Berman 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.45GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Audra J Mccorkle 70 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.57
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.58
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.67
Questions4.75
River Frank 25 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.65
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.78
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.68
Questions4.70
Pamela G Macias 3 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.70
Questions3.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.