Course record SLHS
SLHS 2315
American Sign Language 2
University of Colorado Boulder
396 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Karen Sue Boyd 168 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
168 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boyd vs. the course average
A
+3.6
B
−2.7
C
−0.6
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 5 of 173 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.72
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.60
Reflection4.63
Respect4.68
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.62
Questions4.48
Paige Joy Hawkins 52 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
52 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hawkins vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−8.7
C
+0.5
D
+5.7
F
−3.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 53 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.51
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.05
Reflection4.34
Respect4.77
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.46
Questions4.32
Audra Joan Mccorkle-Geng 75 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mccorkle-Geng vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−3.8
C
−4.2
D
−2.0
F
+3.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 75 enrolled.
Willard Lee Moers 83 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
83 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moers vs. the course average
A
−13.3
B
+16.4
C
−1.6
D
−0.8
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 3 of 86 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.84
Contribution4.58
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.39
Reflection4.51
Respect4.93
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.71
Questions4.38
Rachel G Berman 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.91GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Audra J Mccorkle 34 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.85
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.74
Reflection4.69
Respect4.81
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Pamela G Macias 32 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.79
Contribution4.83
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.99
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
River Frank 15 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Christy Smith 11 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.93
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.98
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.