Course record SLHS

SLHS 1010

Disabilities in Contemporary American Society

University of Colorado Boulder

1,076 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record

Professors 9 of 9

Karen Lynch 478 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
77.6% A
16.9% B
3.6% C
1.0% D
0.8% F

478 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lynch vs. the course average
A +9.5
B −6.0
C −2.7
D −0.4
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

1.0% withdrew · 5 of 483 enrolled.

Jack S Damico 470 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
67.9% A
23.8% B
6.6% C
1.3% D
0.4% F

470 letter grades

Compare with the course
Damico vs. the course average
A −0.3
B +0.9
C +0.4
D −0.2
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 6 of 476 enrolled.

Ryan D Pollard 128 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
33.6% A
42.2% B
14.8% C
3.9% D
5.5% F

128 letter grades

Compare with the course
Pollard vs. the course average
A −34.5
B +19.2
C +8.6
D +2.4
F +4.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 2 of 130 enrolled.

Kayla Fallan Cormier 131 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

131 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.39
Connection4.75
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.22
Reflection4.45
Respect4.68
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.28
Questions4.51
Shannon Elise Robinson 42 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Claire Deferrier Ducatte 76 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

76 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology4.02
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration2.38
Connection4.57
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.81
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.82
Reflection3.78
Respect4.24
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.99
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.78
Questions4.19
Kate Lemons 32 reported responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.20
Connection4.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection3.60
Respect3.90
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.30
Questions3.90
Emily Figliomeni 31 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Linda Gottermeier 94 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

94 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.51
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.48
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.25
Reflection3.98
Respect4.48
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.95
Questions4.38
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.