Course record RUSS
RUSS 2010
Second-Year Russian 1
University of Colorado Boulder
118 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Galina Nicoll 27 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nicoll vs. the course average
A
−6.2
B
+10.9
C
−5.0
D
+1.2
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
6.9% withdrew · 2 of 29 enrolled.
Natalia Plagmann 51 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Plagmann vs. the course average
A
−23.6
B
+7.8
C
+13.3
D
+1.4
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.00
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.24
Reflection4.38
Respect4.43
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Yuliana Gunn 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Laurel Schmuck 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.87GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
7.7% withdrew · 1 of 13 enrolled.
Elena Yurievna Kostoglodova 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.47GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Galina Siarheichyk 38 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.92
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.26
Grading3.89
Reflection4.67
Respect4.69
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.81
Questions4.40
Daria Molchanova 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zhuldyz Tokbulatova 4 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.