Course record RUSS
RUSS 1020
Beginning Russian 2
University of Colorado Boulder
201 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Galina Nicoll 53 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nicoll vs. the course average
A
−8.0
B
+11.6
C
−1.2
D
−1.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 3 of 56 enrolled.
Elena Yurievna Kostoglodova 109 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
109 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kostoglodova vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
−3.4
C
+2.1
D
+0.2
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 6 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.54
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.76
Reflection4.79
Respect4.68
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.89
Questions4.93
Liya Zalaltdinova 26 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zalaltdinova vs. the course average
A
+0.4
B
−4.9
C
−2.9
D
+4.2
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
7.1% withdrew · 2 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.35
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.45
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Beata Gallaher 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.52GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall3.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.60
Reflection3.90
Respect3.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.60
Questions3.50
Galina Siarheichyk 34 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.86
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.54
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.86
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions4.87
Anna Manukyan 2 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Daria Molchanova 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.78
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.58
Reflection4.83
Respect4.87
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.83
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions4.87
Jillian Burgie Costello 21 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.53
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.99
Reflection4.90
Respect4.94
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.86
Questions4.97
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.