Course record RLST

RLST 2700

Native American and Indigenous Religious Traditions

University of Colorado Boulder

402 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 13

Natalie M Avalos 314 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
60.2% A
31.5% B
5.7% C
0.6% D
1.9% F

314 letter grades

Compare with the course
Avalos vs. the course average
A +2.0
B +0.7
C −1.5
D −0.4
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 11 of 325 enrolled.

Jason E Purvis 88 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
51.1% A
28.4% B
12.5% C
2.3% D
5.7% F

88 letter grades

Compare with the course
Purvis vs. the course average
A −7.1
B −2.4
C +5.3
D +1.3
F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 4 of 92 enrolled.

Vincent Edward Vansaghi 9 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Anbareen Shefa 12 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Samuel David Bauman 16 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.85
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.92
Grading3.45
Reflection4.67
Respect4.82
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.32
Questions4.75
Christopher Blake Trujillo 4 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Zhujun Zhujun Ma 4 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Devin Wayand 6 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Grace Holleman 4 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Kolony Holmes 6 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.77
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.93
Reflection4.88
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.