Course record PSYC
PSYC 7713
Practicum in Clinical Psychology
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score80/100
Excellent
Sona Armine Dimidjian 1 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Mark Whisman 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.50
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.77
Reflection4.12
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.42
Questions4.34
Justina Pittman-Wagers 31 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.99
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.76
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joanna Jennifer Arch 10 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.89
Connection5.00
Contribution4.89
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.74
Reflection5.00
Respect4.89
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions4.78
Chelsea Dawn Kilimnik 11 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions4.78
Anahi Collado 4 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.31
Contribution4.77
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.23
Grading5.00
Reflection4.54
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.38
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Julia M Cantrick Zigarelli 6 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.77
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.47
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.46
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.93
Questions4.70
Tamar Kodish 10 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.95
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Margaret Rose Tobias 6 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.