Course record PSYC
PSYC 6200
Issues and Methods in Cognitive Science
University of Colorado Boulder
68 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score62/100
StrongRoland Benoit 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.97GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.
Overall3.88 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.03
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.29
Connection3.78
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.03
Reflection3.69
Respect4.82
Creativity4.28
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.15
Questions4.32
Ronald Mckell Carter Carston 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.96GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.
Albert E. Kim 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.67GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Ronald Mckell Carston 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James H Martin 9 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.96
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.48
Reflection4.78
Respect4.91
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.78
Questions4.78
Jason Ian Zietz 5 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading2.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Marta Ceko 3 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Theodora Chaspari 14 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology4.34
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.14
Connection3.93
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.00
Reflection3.66
Respect4.80
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.29
Questions4.79
Rosemary Cowell 4 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection3.50
Respect4.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.