Course record PSYC

PSYC 5741

General Statistics 1

University of Colorado Boulder

98 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 15

Naomi P Friedman 68 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
63.2% A
35.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
1.5% F

68 letter grades

Compare with the course
Friedman vs. the course average
A +1.0
B +0.6
C −1.0
D same
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

1.4% withdrew · 1 of 69 enrolled.

Joshua Raphael Correll 30 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
60.0% A
33.3% B
3.3% C
0.0% D
3.3% F

30 letter grades

Compare with the course
Correll vs. the course average
A −2.2
B −1.4
C +2.3
D same
F +1.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.

Miriam Guy Clayton 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Anna Lynne Gilmour 10 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Eric Pedersen 26 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.62
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.82
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.82
Questions4.92
Alexandra Flores 8 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Balbir Singh 8 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Claire Morrison 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Lauren Beth Finkelstein 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Boman Groff 8 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show all 15 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.