Course record PSYC

PSYC 5606

Proseminar: Social-Personality Psychology

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score93/100
Excellent

Professors 9 of 9

Angela Bryan 14 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.98
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Eric Pedersen 5 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.99
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Leaf D Van Boven 4 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Tiffany Anne Ito 10 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Bernadette Park 5 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Evava Smith Pietri 10 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joshua Raphael Correll 13 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.89
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.84
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.68
Reflection5.00
Respect4.88
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions4.94
Erik Knight 13 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.78
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.84
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.98
Reflection5.00
Respect4.93
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Veronica Scot Derricks 7 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.