Course record PSYC

PSYC 4376

Research Methods in Social Psychology

University of Colorado Boulder

538 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score71/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 19

Evava Smith Pietri 88 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
87.5% A
9.1% B
1.1% C
0.0% D
2.3% F

88 letter grades

Compare with the course
Pietri vs. the course average
A +10.5
B −6.3
C −5.0
D −0.7
F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 1 of 89 enrolled.

Chelsea Patrick Pierotti 404 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
77.5% A
15.3% B
5.7% C
1.0% D
0.5% F

404 letter grades

Compare with the course
Pierotti vs. the course average
A +0.5
B −0.1
C −0.4
D +0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

1.2% withdrew · 5 of 409 enrolled.

Bernadette Park 46 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
52.2% A
28.3% B
19.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A −24.8
B +12.8
C +13.4
D −0.7
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

6.1% withdrew · 3 of 49 enrolled.

Jairo Andres Ramos 26 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.45
Emily Kramer 64 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

64 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.46
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.42
Reflection4.53
Respect4.71
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Riley Nova Loria 75 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

75 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.77
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.80
Reflection4.78
Respect4.94
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.90
Questions4.55
Francesca Trane 42 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.65
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.92
Reflection4.64
Respect4.95
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.84
Questions4.98
Matthew Puretz 20 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Margy Chen 24 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.55
Journey Simmons 28 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.95
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.95
Reflection3.90
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.05
Questions4.30
Show all 19 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.