Course record PSYC
PSYC 4376
Research Methods in Social Psychology
University of Colorado Boulder
538 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score71/100
Strong
Evava Smith Pietri 88 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
88 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pietri vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−6.3
C
−5.0
D
−0.7
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 89 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.73
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.58
Reflection4.76
Respect4.94
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Chelsea Patrick Pierotti 404 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
404 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pierotti vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−0.1
C
−0.4
D
+0.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 5 of 409 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
220 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.78
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.83
Reflection4.79
Respect4.82
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.78
Questions4.91
Bernadette Park 46 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A
−24.8
B
+12.8
C
+13.4
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.1% withdrew · 3 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Jairo Andres Ramos 26 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.45
Emily Kramer 64 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.46
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.42
Reflection4.53
Respect4.71
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Riley Nova Loria 75 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.77
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.80
Reflection4.78
Respect4.94
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.90
Questions4.55
Francesca Trane 42 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.65
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.92
Reflection4.64
Respect4.95
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.84
Questions4.98
Matthew Puretz 20 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Margy Chen 24 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.55
Journey Simmons 28 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.95
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.95
Reflection3.90
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.05
Questions4.30
Emily Schell 63 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.89
Reflection4.89
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sean Andrew Reilly 22 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Kelly Kandra Hughes 34 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Eleanor Goulden 20 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.95
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.15
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.45
Anika Sansgiry 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.52
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.68
Reflection4.26
Respect4.76
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.84
Questions4.68
Istneydina Thomas 12 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.80
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Irene Delatorre 7 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rayan Elahi 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.45
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.90
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Brandon Cohen 14 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.35
Reflection4.30
Respect4.45
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.