Course record PSYC

PSYC 2012

Biological Psychology

University of Colorado Boulder

3,509 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Elizabeth Ann Stubblefield 234 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
81.6% A
13.7% B
4.3% C
0.4% D
0.0% F

234 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stubblefield vs. the course average
A +38.1
B −20.0
C −12.8
D −3.0
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 4 of 238 enrolled.

Jennifer M Stratford Ph.D. 950 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
56.3% A
30.0% B
10.9% C
1.6% D
1.2% F

950 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A +12.8
B −3.7
C −6.1
D −1.9
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 20 of 970 enrolled.

Karli K Carston 183 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
59.0% A
29.5% B
7.1% C
2.2% D
2.2% F

183 letter grades

Compare with the course
Carston vs. the course average
A +15.5
B −4.2
C −9.9
D −1.3
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

5.7% withdrew · 11 of 194 enrolled.

Lauren Elizabeth Chun 465 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
46.0% A
35.9% B
12.3% C
3.4% D
2.4% F

465 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chun vs. the course average
A +2.5
B +2.2
C −4.8
D same
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 16 of 481 enrolled.

David Lehigh Allen 1,677 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
28.5% A
38.4% B
24.7% C
5.1% D
3.3% F

1,677 letter grades

Compare with the course
Allen vs. the course average
A −15.0
B +4.7
C +7.6
D +1.7
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 55 of 1,732 enrolled.

Jennifer Marie Stratford 1,128 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

1,128 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.78
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.71
Reflection4.76
Respect4.81
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.73
Questions4.85
Helen Yankovich 17 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.22
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.91
Grading3.09
Reflection4.70
Respect4.77
Creativity3.82
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.10
Questions2.53
Kyle Brown 32 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.53
Reflection4.73
Respect4.73
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.41
Questions3.92
Jayson Ball 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Kayla Ann Siletti 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.