Course record PSCI

PSCI 4012

Global Development

University of Colorado Boulder

589 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Grant Cohen 459 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
43.6% A
43.1% B
11.3% C
0.9% D
1.1% F

459 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cohen vs. the course average
A +2.1
B −0.3
C −1.6
D −0.3
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 12 of 471 enrolled.

Trenton Marlar 68 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
39.7% A
41.2% B
17.6% C
1.5% D
0.0% F

68 letter grades

Compare with the course
Marlar vs. the course average
A −1.7
B −2.3
C +4.7
D +0.3
F −1.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 68 enrolled.

Andrew B. Baker 62 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
27.4% A
48.4% B
19.4% C
3.2% D
1.6% F

62 letter grades

Compare with the course
Baker vs. the course average
A −14.0
B +4.9
C +6.5
D +2.0
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 1 of 63 enrolled.

Erkan Gunes 26 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.42
Connection4.62
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.12
Reflection4.48
Respect4.90
Creativity4.61
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.51
Questions4.78
Marija Sajekaite 10 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Jefferson Garrett Seaberg 21 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Dania Arayssi 15 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.10
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.40
Questions3.40
Davis Hughes 55 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.74
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.86
Grading3.91
Reflection4.44
Respect4.83
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.28
Questions4.29
Ansgarius Manek 14 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.20
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.50
Reflection3.80
Respect4.10
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Mohammad Rezwanul Haque Masud 12 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.