Course record PSCI
PSCI 3123
War, Peace, and Strategic Defense
University of Colorado Boulder
695 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score31/100
Below average
Aysegul Aydin 137 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
137 letter grades
Compare with the course
Aydin vs. the course average
A
+23.8
B
−15.5
C
−7.4
D
−1.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
8.1% withdrew · 12 of 149 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Franke Wilmer 70 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wilmer vs. the course average
A
+18.8
B
−5.3
C
−11.1
D
−1.0
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 4 of 74 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.00
Grant Cohen 41 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cohen vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+20.4
C
−10.5
D
+2.4
F
−2.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 3 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.03 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Michael David Kanner 218 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
218 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kanner vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
+1.3
C
+0.7
D
−0.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 10 of 228 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.80
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.69
Reflection4.59
Respect4.54
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.69
Questions4.60
Jaroslav Tir 156 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
156 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tir vs. the course average
A
−7.8
B
+0.3
C
+8.3
D
−1.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 158 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.92
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.81
Questions4.83
Gregory D Young 73 grades · 1 term 2.56GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
−34.3
B
+18.0
C
+10.6
D
+4.4
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 3 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Cong Wang 26 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Andrew Mcleer 70 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.91
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.64
Reflection4.77
Respect4.91
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.53
Questions4.85
Samuel Kelcey Foredyce 27 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.80
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.31
Reflection4.65
Respect4.62
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.38
Questions4.31
Chris Jackson 56 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.86
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.84
Reflection4.75
Respect4.89
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.84
Questions4.86
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.