Course record PSCI
PSCI 3123
War, Peace, and Strategic Defense
University of Colorado Boulder
695 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score31/100
Below average
Aysegul Aydin 137 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
137 letter grades
Compare with the course
Aydin vs. the course average
A
+23.8
B
−15.5
C
−7.4
D
−1.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
8.1% withdrew · 12 of 149 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Franke Wilmer 70 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wilmer vs. the course average
A
+18.8
B
−5.3
C
−11.1
D
−1.0
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 4 of 74 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.00
Grant Cohen 41 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cohen vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+20.4
C
−10.5
D
+2.4
F
−2.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 3 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.03 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Michael David Kanner 218 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
218 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kanner vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
+1.3
C
+0.7
D
−0.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 10 of 228 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.80
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.69
Reflection4.59
Respect4.54
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.69
Questions4.60
Jaroslav Tir 156 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
156 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tir vs. the course average
A
−7.8
B
+0.3
C
+8.3
D
−1.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 158 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.92
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.81
Questions4.83
Gregory D Young 73 grades · 1 term 2.56GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
−34.3
B
+18.0
C
+10.6
D
+4.4
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 3 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Cong Wang 26 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Andrew Mcleer 70 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.91
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.64
Reflection4.77
Respect4.91
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.53
Questions4.85
Samuel Kelcey Foredyce 27 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.80
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.31
Reflection4.65
Respect4.62
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.38
Questions4.31
Chris Jackson 56 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.86
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.84
Reflection4.75
Respect4.89
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.84
Questions4.86
Tania Massicotte 23 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Steven Van De Laarschot 21 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration2.78
Connection4.52
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.87
Reflection4.17
Respect4.61
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.48
Questions4.57
Samantha Louse Moya 17 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.