Course record PSCI
PSCI 3062
Revolution and Political Violence
University of Colorado Boulder
445 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Michael David Kanner 78 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
78 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kanner vs. the course average
A
+14.6
B
−6.4
C
−6.3
D
+0.4
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 79 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.97
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.53
Reflection4.47
Respect4.57
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.80
Questions4.77
Alberto Miguel Burgos-Rivera 54 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Burgos-Rivera vs. the course average
A
+14.0
B
−6.6
C
−4.2
D
−2.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.9% withdrew · 4 of 58 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.29
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.69
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.12
Grading3.97
Reflection4.29
Respect4.04
Creativity3.68
Feedback3.02
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.09
Questions4.21
Erkan Gunes 65 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gunes vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−6.7
C
−7.6
D
+1.4
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 3 of 68 enrolled.
Overall4.43 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.13
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.05
Reflection4.00
Respect4.54
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.21
Questions4.21
Samuel Kelcey Foredyce 70 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Foredyce vs. the course average
A
−8.4
B
+2.1
C
+6.1
D
−0.4
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 3 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.45
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Gregory D Young 155 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
155 letter grades
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
−13.5
B
+9.3
C
+4.1
D
+1.1
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.5% withdrew · 9 of 164 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.78
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.25
Reflection4.38
Respect4.85
Creativity4.58
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.71
Questions4.52
Jordan Noelle Hale 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.89GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
11.5% withdrew · 3 of 26 enrolled.
Overall2.92 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology1.83
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.17
Connection3.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion2.23
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.17
Reflection3.40
Respect4.10
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.17
Interaction2.80
Challenge3.33
Questions3.23
Mateusz Michal Leszczynski 50 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Gustavo Adolfo Perez 26 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Scott Benjamin Ritner 5 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Rachel Janie O'Neal 30 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.44
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.42
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.46
Questions4.32
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.