Course record PSCI
PSCI 2106
Introduction to Public Policy Analysis
University of Colorado Boulder
800 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Srinivas C Parinandi 44 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parinandi vs. the course average
A
+17.8
B
−3.0
C
−10.5
D
−1.8
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Juliemarie Anjali Shepherd Macklin 170 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
170 letter grades
Compare with the course
Macklin vs. the course average
A
+12.0
B
−5.4
C
−6.3
D
+0.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 5 of 175 enrolled.
Nancy E Billica 326 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
326 letter grades
Compare with the course
Billica vs. the course average
A
+9.7
B
−6.7
C
−1.7
D
−0.5
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 12 of 338 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
118 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.88
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.36
Reflection4.48
Respect4.81
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.47
Questions4.52
Josalyn C Williams 72 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Williams vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
+5.0
C
−1.6
D
+2.4
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 3 of 75 enrolled.
Overall3.73 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology3.54
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration2.94
Connection4.25
Contribution3.48
Discussion3.24
Inclusivity3.97
Grading3.91
Reflection3.80
Respect4.45
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.28
Interaction3.67
Challenge3.68
Questions3.63
Hyodong Sohn 110 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
110 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sohn vs. the course average
A
−23.1
B
+15.7
C
+8.2
D
−0.8
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 5 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.69
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.50
Reflection4.64
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.67
Questions4.79
Kenneth Norman Bickers 78 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
78 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bickers vs. the course average
A
−35.0
B
+14.9
C
+16.7
D
+0.8
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 2 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.87
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.48
Connection4.82
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.82
Reflection4.32
Respect4.31
Creativity3.92
Feedback3.27
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.04
Questions4.35
Christina Anne Boyes 24 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Michelle Elizabeth Benedum 19 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Julie Marie Shepherd 59 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.51
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.42
Reflection4.31
Respect4.69
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.33
Questions4.36
Mateusz Michal Leszczynski 26 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Rachel Janie O'Neal 23 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Joey Pedersen 19 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Isaac Sours 19 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Sara Louise Hoose 48 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Aine Katherine Santala 122 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.65
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.17
Reflection4.48
Respect4.57
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.52
Komal Preet Kaur 5 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.23
Inclusivity3.77
Grading2.77
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.16
Feedback2.07
Interaction4.16
Challenge3.84
Questions3.23
Zohar Naaman 30 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Ansgarius Manek 75 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Marayna Martinez 213 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
213 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.44
Reflection4.52
Respect4.70
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.50
Questions4.66
Katie Sevin 70 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Furkan Sumbul 67 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Katherine Louise Sevin 2 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.