Course record PSCI
PSCI 2075
Quantitative Research Methods
University of Colorado Boulder
1,675 grades35 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Srinivas C Parinandi 221 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
221 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parinandi vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−1.4
C
+0.6
D
−0.2
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 14 of 235 enrolled.
Overall4.28 / 5
195 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.21
Contribution3.79
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity4.34
Grading3.97
Reflection3.95
Respect4.54
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.12
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.12
Questions4.32
Andrew Philips 524 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
524 letter grades
Compare with the course
Philips vs. the course average
A
+2.1
B
+0.6
C
−2.0
D
−0.6
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 25 of 549 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
335 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.11
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.13
Reflection3.93
Respect4.51
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.22
Questions4.42
Alexandra Arons Siegel 505 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
505 letter grades
Compare with the course
Siegel vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
−4.0
C
+1.2
D
−0.1
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 35 of 540 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
191 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.36
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.58
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.43
Questions4.58
Steven Matthew Beard 235 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
235 letter grades
Compare with the course
Beard vs. the course average
A
−8.6
B
+9.0
C
−1.3
D
+0.9
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 5 of 240 enrolled.
Overall3.77 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.31
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.13
Contribution3.56
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.61
Reflection3.93
Respect4.43
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.21
Interaction4.02
Challenge4.03
Questions4.03
Sarah Hunter 190 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
190 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hunter vs. the course average
A
−4.3
B
−0.4
C
+3.3
D
+1.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 10 of 200 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.00
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.95
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.70
Questions3.85
Brendan James Connell 15 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Brett Ryan Bessen 37 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.49
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.15
Reflection4.31
Respect4.56
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.17
Questions4.33
Komal Preet Kaur 99 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.58
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.39
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.44
Contribution3.77
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.28
Reflection3.77
Respect4.19
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.41
Interaction4.03
Challenge3.68
Questions4.05
Hyodong Sohn 78 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.00
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.13
Reflection4.14
Respect4.53
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.37
Questions4.39
Kimberlee Chang 15 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.