Course record PSCI

PSCI 2075

Quantitative Research Methods

University of Colorado Boulder

1,675 grades35 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average

Professors 35 of 35

Srinivas C Parinandi 221 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
53.4% A
32.1% B
10.4% C
2.3% D
1.8% F

221 letter grades

Compare with the course
Parinandi vs. the course average
A +2.3
B −1.4
C +0.6
D −0.2
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 14 of 235 enrolled.

Andrew Philips 524 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
53.2% A
34.2% B
7.8% C
1.9% D
2.9% F

524 letter grades

Compare with the course
Philips vs. the course average
A +2.1
B +0.6
C −2.0
D −0.6
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.6% withdrew · 25 of 549 enrolled.

Alexandra Arons Siegel 505 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
53.5% A
29.5% B
11.1% C
2.4% D
3.6% F

505 letter grades

Compare with the course
Siegel vs. the course average
A +2.4
B −4.0
C +1.2
D −0.1
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 35 of 540 enrolled.

Steven Matthew Beard 235 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
42.6% A
42.6% B
8.5% C
3.4% D
3.0% F

235 letter grades

Compare with the course
Beard vs. the course average
A −8.6
B +9.0
C −1.3
D +0.9
F same

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 5 of 240 enrolled.

Sarah Hunter 190 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
46.8% A
33.2% B
13.2% C
3.7% D
3.2% F

190 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hunter vs. the course average
A −4.3
B −0.4
C +3.3
D +1.2
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.0% withdrew · 10 of 200 enrolled.

Brendan James Connell 15 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Brett Ryan Bessen 37 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.49
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.15
Reflection4.31
Respect4.56
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.17
Questions4.33
Komal Preet Kaur 99 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

99 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.58
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.39
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.44
Contribution3.77
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.28
Reflection3.77
Respect4.19
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.41
Interaction4.03
Challenge3.68
Questions4.05
Hyodong Sohn 78 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

78 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.00
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.13
Reflection4.14
Respect4.53
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.37
Questions4.39
Kimberlee Chang 15 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Dalton Cunha Dorr 7 reported responses 3.08Eval / 5
Overall3.08 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.05
Technology1.15
Synthesis2.52
Collaboration1.11
Connection2.51
Contribution1.04
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.48
Reflection2.03
Respect4.88
Creativity4.85
Feedback1.59
Interaction3.92
Challenge4.85
Questions2.07
Hannah Lynn Paul 39 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.55
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Kathryn Rose Schauer 37 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.33
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.63
Reflection4.36
Respect4.61
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.39
Questions4.82
Adriana Lizette Molina Garzon 23 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.35
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.25
Reflection3.25
Respect3.70
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.25
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.25
Questions3.40
Pavel Bacovsky 4 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Courtney Jean Nava 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Tyler Patrick Garrett 14 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.60
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.45
Questions4.85
Trenton Marlar 8 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.15
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Damon Charles Roberts 19 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.78
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.74
Questions4.78
Sara Louise Hoose 41 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.89
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.13
Reflection4.12
Respect4.37
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.18
Interaction3.94
Challenge4.18
Questions4.44
Samantha Register 59 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.01
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.25
Reflection4.53
Respect4.60
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.42
Questions4.57
Rachel Janie O'Neal 29 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.00
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.10
Questions4.25
Gustavo Adolfo Perez 67 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

67 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.71
Reflection4.63
Respect4.77
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.69
Questions4.84
Steven Van De Laarschot 38 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.39
Connection4.08
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.15
Reflection4.06
Respect4.43
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.08
Questions4.51
Alberto Miguel Burgos-Rivera 36 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.10
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.45
Reflection4.00
Respect4.25
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.70
Questions4.10
Sam Moya 9 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.64
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.62
Contribution2.87
Discussion3.31
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.75
Reflection3.71
Respect4.87
Creativity4.77
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.20
Questions3.45
Katie Marie Glenn 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.85
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Jon Cohen 119 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

119 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.57
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.85
Reflection4.76
Respect4.88
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.92
Alex Newhouse 57 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.53
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.74
Reflection4.63
Respect4.85
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.66
Questions4.81
Stone Neilon 20 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Tania Massicotte 50 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.16
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.19
Reflection4.10
Respect4.66
Creativity4.36
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.12
Challenge3.94
Questions4.32
Poushali Mohanta 44 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology3.88
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.37
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.81
Grading3.71
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.14
Challenge3.67
Questions3.86
Chris Jackson 21 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.55
Questions4.90
Samantha Louse Moya 8 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.89
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.05
Reflection4.27
Respect4.93
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.27
Questions4.18
Donald Caviness 14 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.05
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.10
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.15
Reflection3.20
Respect4.05
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.15
Questions3.65
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.