Course record PSCI

PSCI 2012

Introduction to Comparative Politics

University of Colorado Boulder

2,616 grades44 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average

Professors 44 of 44

Carew Elizabeth Boulding 295 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
44.4% A
43.1% B
5.4% C
3.7% D
3.4% F

295 letter grades

Compare with the course
Boulding vs. the course average
A +1.9
B +6.7
C −5.9
D −0.1
F −2.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 12 of 307 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Sarah Wilson Sokhey 801 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
55.2% A
23.5% B
10.5% C
2.9% D
8.0% F

801 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sokhey vs. the course average
A +12.6
B −12.8
C −0.8
D −1.0
F +2.0

Difference in percentage points.

4.2% withdrew · 35 of 836 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Andrew B. Baker 551 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
37.7% A
42.1% B
11.4% C
3.8% D
4.9% F

551 letter grades

Compare with the course
Baker vs. the course average
A −4.8
B +5.8
C +0.2
D same
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 22 of 573 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Svetoslav Derderyan 62 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
22.6% A
54.8% B
19.4% C
1.6% D
1.6% F

62 letter grades

Compare with the course
Derderyan vs. the course average
A −20.0
B +18.5
C +8.1
D −2.2
F −4.4

Difference in percentage points.

4.6% withdrew · 3 of 65 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Sven H Steinmo 633 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
35.2% A
41.4% B
12.8% C
5.7% D
4.9% F

633 letter grades

Compare with the course
Steinmo vs. the course average
A −7.3
B +5.1
C +1.5
D +1.8
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 32 of 665 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Joseph H Jupille 274 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
34.7% A
39.1% B
14.2% C
3.3% D
8.8% F

274 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jupille vs. the course average
A −7.9
B +2.7
C +3.0
D −0.6
F +2.8

Difference in percentage points.

4.5% withdrew · 13 of 287 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mohammad Rezwanul Haque Masud 129 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

129 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.84
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.22
Reflection4.61
Respect4.64
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.73
Questions4.31
Open full professor record
Sara Louise Hoose 15 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.85
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.40
Reflection3.95
Respect4.40
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.80
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Alberto Miguel Burgos-Rivera 81 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.97
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.93
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Marija Sajekaite 43 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.84
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.53
Reflection4.74
Respect4.88
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.53
Questions4.78
Open full professor record
Andrew Mcleer 31 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.51
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.39
Reflection4.26
Respect4.66
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.64
Open full professor record
Rachel Janie O'Neal 55 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.62
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.57
Reflection4.82
Respect4.89
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.68
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
Christopher St Hilaire Jorde 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.86
Connection5.00
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.71
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.57
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kathryn Rose Schauer 47 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.31
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.06
Reflection4.11
Respect4.66
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Kyle Lee Engels 58 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.79
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.56
Reflection4.62
Respect4.78
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.48
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Sinan Nadarevic 126 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

126 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.79
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.69
Reflection4.69
Respect4.75
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.48
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Mateusz Michal Leszczynski 78 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

78 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.93
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.69
Reflection4.65
Respect4.94
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.68
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Zoe Rebecca Moss 38 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.10
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.35
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Michelle Elizabeth Benedum 37 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Ken Stallman 25 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.25
Respect4.45
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.25
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Isaac Sours 34 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.66
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.57
Reflection4.54
Respect4.75
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.57
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Gustavo Adolfo Perez 23 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.95
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.92
Reflection4.89
Respect4.93
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.84
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Marija Verner 12 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Brendan James Connell 3 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Isha Banerjee 141 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

141 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.52
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.33
Reflection4.48
Respect4.79
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.33
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Case Osborn 44 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.50
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.50
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Eman Bensreiti 43 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.39
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.50
Reflection4.48
Respect4.65
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.52
Questions4.78
Open full professor record
Jon Cohen 134 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

134 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.81
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.69
Reflection4.80
Respect4.84
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.73
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Dania Arayssi 59 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.60
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.37
Grading3.70
Reflection4.27
Respect4.59
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.16
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Anna Kowalski 46 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.52
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.44
Reflection4.45
Respect4.71
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.53
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Scott Benjamin Ritner 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Stone Neilon 30 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Tania Massicotte 45 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.40
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.57
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Jeffrey Scott Nonnemacher 53 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.91
Contribution4.86
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.76
Reflection4.73
Respect4.89
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Romulo Hannig Goncalves Da Silva 145 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

145 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.76
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.73
Reflection4.68
Respect4.94
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.66
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Alex Newhouse 37 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Aine Katherine Santala 46 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.69
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.54
Reflection4.58
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.27
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Alba Ramos Escobar 81 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.63
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.35
Reflection4.57
Respect4.84
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.51
Questions4.56
Open full professor record
Varnitha Kurli 19 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.00
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.50
Reflection3.95
Respect4.25
Creativity3.75
Feedback2.85
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.60
Questions3.60
Open full professor record
Sarah Elizabeth Brown 15 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.83
Contribution4.86
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.58
Reflection4.91
Respect4.98
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Regina Bateson 265 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

265 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.85
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.58
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Zeynep Oguz 23 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Alexandra Philippidis 44 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Inbo Park 31 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.45
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.