Course record PMUS
PMUS 2726
Voice
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable18 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score81/100
Excellent
Alice Jeanne Del Simone 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Seth Mcclain Tack 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jennifer Bird-Arvidsson 9 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.35
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.92
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Matthew Wren Chellis 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.31
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Abigail Andrews Nims 8 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.51
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
John Seesholtz 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andrew B Garland 19 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.07
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.24
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Alex Joseph King 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Paul Jeffrey Wolf 3 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.54
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.92
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.83
Questions5.00
Sarah Elizabeth Cain 4 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.78
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.35
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.78
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.