Course record PMUS

PMUS 1726

Voice

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable23 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score71/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 23

Jennifer Bird-Arvidsson 17 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.93
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.07
Reflection4.78
Respect4.78
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.96
Questions4.76
Andrew B Garland 24 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.33
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.13
Reflection4.96
Respect4.92
Creativity4.72
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Paul Jeffrey Wolf 5 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.23
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity1.92
Grading4.23
Reflection4.79
Respect3.92
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.94
Challenge5.00
Questions4.79
Christine Marie Li 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kelly E Riordan 3 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Jennifer Marie De Dominici 23 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.80
Contribution4.89
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.99
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Abigail Andrews Nims 4 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.97
Respect4.97
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alex Joseph King 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Synthesis5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Melissa Lubecke 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Julie Simson 6 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.56
Contribution4.56
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.11
Reflection5.00
Respect4.98
Creativity4.52
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.93
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show all 23 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.