Course record PMUS
PMUS 1726
Voice
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable23 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score71/100
StrongJennifer Bird-Arvidsson 17 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.93
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.07
Reflection4.78
Respect4.78
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.96
Questions4.76
Andrew B Garland 24 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.33
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.13
Reflection4.96
Respect4.92
Creativity4.72
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Paul Jeffrey Wolf 5 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.23
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity1.92
Grading4.23
Reflection4.79
Respect3.92
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.94
Challenge5.00
Questions4.79
Christine Marie Li 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kelly E Riordan 3 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Jennifer Marie De Dominici 23 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.80
Contribution4.89
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.99
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Abigail Andrews Nims 4 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.97
Respect4.97
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alex Joseph King 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Synthesis5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Melissa Lubecke 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Julie Simson 6 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.56
Contribution4.56
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.11
Reflection5.00
Respect4.98
Creativity4.52
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.93
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.