Course record PMUS
PMUS 1105
Keyboard Musicianship 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Er-Hsuan Li 15 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration2.75
Connection3.60
Contribution2.85
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.25
Grading4.80
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.25
Questions4.85
Carl Jackson Feaster 19 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.43
Connection3.69
Contribution3.71
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.23
Reflection4.35
Respect4.54
Creativity3.98
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.62
Questions4.55
Yukino Miyake 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.80
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity3.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Alejandro M. Cremaschi 15 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.98
Connection2.89
Contribution4.02
Discussion3.15
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.97
Reflection4.97
Respect4.03
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Anastasiia Pavlenko 16 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.15
Connection2.70
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity3.20
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.15
Questions4.60
Jessica Daniel 4 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Angelique Scully 6 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Kimia Peykarzadeh 18 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.35
Reflection3.80
Respect4.55
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.45
Questions4.20
Mario L Barbosa 9 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.26
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity1.92
Grading3.04
Reflection4.13
Respect4.00
Creativity3.44
Feedback3.78
Interaction3.53
Challenge4.48
Questions4.09
James Hunter Morris 8 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.98
Synthesis3.32
Collaboration2.42
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.32
Reflection2.55
Respect4.93
Creativity2.53
Feedback3.44
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.39
Questions4.23
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.