Course record PLAN
PLAN 3100
Studio 2: Intermediate Sustainable Planning and Urban Design
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score24/100
Below averageDanielle Rivera 13 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Stacey Lynn Schulte 9 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
David Wayne Shirk 21 reported responses 3.13Eval / 5
Overall3.13 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.01
Technology2.92
Synthesis2.92
Collaboration3.61
Connection3.76
Contribution3.31
Discussion3.24
Inclusivity3.08
Grading2.54
Reflection2.92
Respect3.92
Creativity3.24
Feedback2.85
Interaction3.85
Challenge2.78
Questions2.62
Bruce Evan Goldstein 18 reported responses 3.19Eval / 5
Overall3.19 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.20
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.20
Grading2.50
Reflection2.90
Respect3.80
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.70
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.20
Questions3.00
Valeria Henao Cano 12 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Virginia Ann Skartvedt 9 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.10
Reflection3.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.60
Questions4.10
David John Kemp 8 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Sara Tabatabaie 7 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect3.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.