Course record PHYS
PHYS 4510
Optics
University of Colorado Boulder
74 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Ivan Milic 43 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Milic vs. the course average
A
+10.8
B
−15.9
C
+6.4
D
same
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 2 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.78
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Ivan I Smalyukh 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.43GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.
Overall2.77 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology2.60
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.00
Discussion2.50
Inclusivity2.60
Grading2.30
Reflection3.00
Respect3.80
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.30
Interaction3.50
Challenge2.40
Questions2.50
Dmitry Reznik 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.64GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
9.1% withdrew · 1 of 11 enrolled.
Overall3.91 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.54
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.10
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.03
Reflection4.07
Respect3.88
Creativity4.46
Feedback3.36
Interaction3.68
Challenge3.93
Questions3.45
Nanako Shitara 16 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Souvik Ghosh 12 reported responses 3.21Eval / 5
Overall3.21 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.00
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.60
Grading2.90
Reflection3.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.60
Taewoo Lee 12 reported responses 3.13Eval / 5
Overall3.13 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.20
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.60
Grading2.90
Reflection3.00
Respect4.60
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.50
Challenge2.90
Questions3.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.