Course record PHYS

PHYS 4410

Quantum Mechanics 2

University of Colorado Boulder

417 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 13

Jacob A Pettine 28 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
42.9% A
42.9% B
14.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

28 letter grades

Compare with the course
Pettine vs. the course average
A −0.8
B +9.0
C −1.5
D −2.9
F −3.8

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 2 of 30 enrolled.

Andrew James Lucas 112 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
50.0% A
28.6% B
18.8% C
0.0% D
2.7% F

112 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lucas vs. the course average
A +6.4
B −5.2
C +2.9
D −2.9
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 4 of 116 enrolled.

Murray John Holland 54 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
50.0% A
27.8% B
13.0% C
3.7% D
5.6% F

54 letter grades

Compare with the course
Holland vs. the course average
A +6.4
B −6.0
C −2.9
D +0.8
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

8.5% withdrew · 5 of 59 enrolled.

Steven J Pollock 107 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
46.7% A
29.0% B
17.8% C
1.9% D
4.7% F

107 letter grades

Compare with the course
Pollock vs. the course average
A +3.1
B −4.8
C +1.9
D −1.0
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.6% withdrew · 4 of 111 enrolled.

Bethany R Wilcox 52 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
36.5% A
44.2% B
11.5% C
5.8% D
1.9% F

52 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wilcox vs. the course average
A −7.1
B +10.4
C −4.3
D +2.9
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 52 enrolled.

Scott E Parker 42 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
33.3% A
45.2% B
9.5% C
4.8% D
7.1% F

42 letter grades

Compare with the course
Parker vs. the course average
A −10.3
B +11.4
C −6.3
D +1.9
F +3.3

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 3 of 45 enrolled.

Thomas Richard Schibli 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.50GPA
18.2% A
40.9% B
22.7% C
13.6% D
4.5% F

22 letter grades · Limited sample

12.0% withdrew · 3 of 25 enrolled.

Charles Rogers 22 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Xiaoyang Huang 32 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Evan Wynn Wickenden 31 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.