Course record PHYS
PHYS 3090
Introduction to Quantum Computing
University of Colorado Boulder
346 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Murray John Holland 145 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
145 letter grades
Compare with the course
Holland vs. the course average
A
+5.7
B
+6.6
C
−13.2
D
−0.8
F
+1.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 6 of 151 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.64
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.54
Reflection4.52
Respect4.51
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.83
Questions4.79
Alexandra Kolla 133 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
133 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kolla vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
−1.0
C
+6.2
D
+1.6
F
−2.9
Difference in percentage points.
15.3% withdrew · 24 of 157 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Steven Kordonowy 68 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kordonowy vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
−12.0
C
+15.9
D
−1.4
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
8.1% withdrew · 6 of 74 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Jacob Lucas Beckey 25 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Kenneth Jon Higginbotham 3 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution2.70
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.30
Interaction4.70
Blake Alexander Lee 3 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution2.70
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.30
Interaction4.70
Sichong Ma 3 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution2.70
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.30
Interaction4.70
Xun Gao 36 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.24
Connection3.52
Contribution3.45
Discussion3.48
Inclusivity2.48
Grading3.43
Reflection3.85
Respect4.45
Creativity3.77
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.84
Challenge4.00
Questions4.05
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.