Course record PHYS

PHYS 2150

Experimental Physics 2

University of Colorado Boulder

927 grades46 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score30/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 46

Keith A Ulmer 318 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
65.1% A
18.2% B
9.7% C
2.5% D
4.4% F

318 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ulmer vs. the course average
A +8.1
B −4.5
C −0.8
D −0.3
F −2.5

Difference in percentage points.

9.4% withdrew · 33 of 351 enrolled.

Noel A Clark 95 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
55.8% A
31.6% B
6.3% C
2.1% D
4.2% F

95 letter grades

Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A −1.2
B +8.8
C −4.3
D −0.7
F −2.7

Difference in percentage points.

16.7% withdrew · 19 of 114 enrolled.

Shuo Sun 224 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
63.8% A
17.0% B
10.7% C
3.6% D
4.9% F

224 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sun vs. the course average
A +6.9
B −5.8
C +0.1
D +0.8
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 16 of 240 enrolled.

Heather Jean Lewandowski 210 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
44.8% A
28.6% B
13.3% C
1.9% D
11.4% F

210 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lewandowski vs. the course average
A −12.2
B +5.8
C +2.8
D −0.9
F +4.5

Difference in percentage points.

7.9% withdrew · 18 of 228 enrolled.

Sasha Mark Novack 80 grades · 1 term 2.73GPA
38.8% A
31.3% B
11.3% C
5.0% D
13.8% F

80 letter grades

Compare with the course
Novack vs. the course average
A −18.2
B +8.5
C +0.7
D +2.2
F +6.8

Difference in percentage points.

10.1% withdrew · 9 of 89 enrolled.

John C Zaris 14 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration2.60
Connection3.55
Contribution3.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.05
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.35
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Yijian Cai 17 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.85
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.95
Bojun Zhou 32 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.51
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.72
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.68
River Alyn Leversee 9 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity1.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Jesse Kruse 14 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.65
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.87
Reflection4.59
Respect4.95
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.90
Questions4.96
Show all 46 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.