Course record PHYS

PHYS 2150

Experimental Physics 2

University of Colorado Boulder

927 grades46 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score30/100
Below average

Professors 46 of 46

Keith A Ulmer 318 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
65.1% A
18.2% B
9.7% C
2.5% D
4.4% F

318 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ulmer vs. the course average
A +8.1
B −4.5
C −0.8
D −0.3
F −2.5

Difference in percentage points.

9.4% withdrew · 33 of 351 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Noel A Clark 95 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
55.8% A
31.6% B
6.3% C
2.1% D
4.2% F

95 letter grades

Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A −1.2
B +8.8
C −4.3
D −0.7
F −2.7

Difference in percentage points.

16.7% withdrew · 19 of 114 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Shuo Sun 224 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
63.8% A
17.0% B
10.7% C
3.6% D
4.9% F

224 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sun vs. the course average
A +6.9
B −5.8
C +0.1
D +0.8
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 16 of 240 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Heather Jean Lewandowski 210 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
44.8% A
28.6% B
13.3% C
1.9% D
11.4% F

210 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lewandowski vs. the course average
A −12.2
B +5.8
C +2.8
D −0.9
F +4.5

Difference in percentage points.

7.9% withdrew · 18 of 228 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Sasha Mark Novack 80 grades · 1 term 2.73GPA
38.8% A
31.3% B
11.3% C
5.0% D
13.8% F

80 letter grades

Compare with the course
Novack vs. the course average
A −18.2
B +8.5
C +0.7
D +2.2
F +6.8

Difference in percentage points.

10.1% withdrew · 9 of 89 enrolled.

Open full professor record
John C Zaris 14 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration2.60
Connection3.55
Contribution3.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.05
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.35
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Yijian Cai 17 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.85
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Bojun Zhou 32 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.51
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.72
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
River Alyn Leversee 9 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity1.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Jesse Kruse 14 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.65
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.87
Reflection4.59
Respect4.95
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.90
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Noah Zipper 5 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Thomas M Horning 11 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Zachary Parrott 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Yunzhe Shao 4 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Bingchen Zhong 12 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.62
Connection3.65
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity3.01
Grading4.24
Reflection4.26
Respect5.00
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.85
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Kaitlyn Nicole David 7 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Sarang Yeola 14 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.59
Connection3.81
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.52
Reflection4.04
Respect4.76
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.54
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Jorge Luis Ramirez Ortiz 12 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Richa Sapkota 7 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.25
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.75
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Lindell Williams 6 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.35
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.25
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Luke Zhou 13 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.85
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Darwin Quiroz 9 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.15
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Clay Klein 9 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.25
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Fatema Fairooz 12 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology3.68
Synthesis2.73
Collaboration4.38
Connection3.95
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.68
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.08
Reflection3.40
Respect4.08
Creativity3.12
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.33
Challenge2.98
Questions4.22
Open full professor record
Hagan Hensley 5 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.65
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.35
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alyx Patterson 9 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Gayle Caryn Geschwind 8 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.35
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.50
Reflection4.45
Respect4.90
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.25
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Jiayi Liu 6 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Yichi Zhang 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.65
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.25
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Justin Nicoski 10 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.80
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.85
Reflection3.70
Respect4.85
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.85
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Andy Bradfield 6 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.85
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.75
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Danny Wendt 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.65
Contribution4.25
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.35
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Aidan Jones 34 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.41
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.62
Reflection4.71
Respect4.79
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.61
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Eli Katz 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.95
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.25
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Xiongwei Liu 15 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.40
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.05
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tayler Martin 19 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Bethany R Wilcox 52 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.58
Technology4.22
Synthesis3.36
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.15
Contribution3.92
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity2.61
Grading3.46
Reflection3.82
Respect4.58
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.36
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.52
Questions3.64
Open full professor record
Krish Patel 10 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Andrew Berger 18 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.40
Contribution3.65
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.55
Reflection3.40
Respect4.00
Creativity3.05
Feedback3.45
Interaction3.75
Challenge3.70
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Michael Topper 9 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.90
Reflection3.95
Respect3.85
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.65
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Jonan-Rohi Plueger 20 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.27
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.32
Reflection4.31
Respect5.00
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.19
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Spencer Jordan Hall 6 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.60
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Sara Moore 13 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Donna Depolo 3 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Prithwiraj Ganguly 2 reported responses 2.82Eval / 5
Overall2.82 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection1.00
Contribution2.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.00
Reflection2.50
Respect3.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.00
Questions2.50
Open full professor record
Xinrong Chen 5 reported responses 3.34Eval / 5
Overall3.34 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.20
Reflection3.60
Respect4.20
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.