Course record PHYS
PHYS 2020
General Physics 2
University of Colorado Boulder
1,125 grades41 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Colin G West 346 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
346 letter grades
Compare with the course
West vs. the course average
A
+18.3
B
−2.5
C
−12.8
D
−1.5
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 2 of 348 enrolled.
Overall4.85 / 5
145 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.82
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.81
Reflection4.91
Respect4.82
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.90
Questions4.81
Nuris Figueroa Morales 153 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
153 letter grades
Compare with the course
Morales vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+9.3
C
−2.3
D
−1.5
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 1 of 154 enrolled.
Overall3.91 / 5
240 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.15
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.00
Reflection4.05
Respect4.45
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.00
Questions3.95
Alysia Diane Marino 99 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Marino vs. the course average
A
+5.4
B
−2.7
C
−2.0
D
−1.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 5 of 104 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Eleanor R Hodby 199 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
199 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hodby vs. the course average
A
−13.5
B
+6.7
C
+7.5
D
−1.1
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 11 of 210 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
338 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.58
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.34
Reflection4.51
Respect4.50
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.52
Questions4.49
Tobin Leo Munsat 254 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
254 letter grades
Compare with the course
Munsat vs. the course average
A
−10.2
B
−5.2
C
+9.5
D
+3.0
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 14 of 268 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.38
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.27
Reflection4.37
Respect4.73
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.49
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.50
Questions4.34
Shijie Zhong 74 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zhong vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
−4.3
C
+14.6
D
+4.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
8.6% withdrew · 7 of 81 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Yifan Hong 31 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.48
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.18
Reflection4.58
Respect4.98
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.63
Questions4.91
Xu Zheng 10 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.75
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Sarang Yeola 16 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.05
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Evan Wynn Wickenden 16 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.15
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.