Course record PHYS
PHYS 1240
Sound and Music
University of Colorado Boulder
765 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work
Sascha Kempf 131 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
131 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kempf vs. the course average
A
+17.3
B
−7.0
C
−11.3
D
+4.0
F
−3.0
Difference in percentage points.
7.7% withdrew · 11 of 142 enrolled.
Overall3.29 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.50
Contribution2.60
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.30
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.40
Questions3.40
Mihaly Horanyi 110 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
110 letter grades
Compare with the course
Horanyi vs. the course average
A
+13.1
B
−3.7
C
−10.9
D
−3.0
F
+4.5
Difference in percentage points.
9.8% withdrew · 12 of 122 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.54
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.38
Contribution3.82
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.45
Grading3.54
Reflection4.02
Respect4.60
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.13
Interaction4.52
Challenge3.66
Questions4.40
Tyler C Mcmaken 278 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
278 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcmaken vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+6.0
C
−3.1
D
−2.0
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 15 of 293 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.68
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.65
Reflection4.59
Respect4.82
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.59
Questions4.79
Scott E Parker 134 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
134 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parker vs. the course average
A
−11.7
B
−5.2
C
+19.9
D
−1.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 8 of 142 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.80
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.20
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Patricia Rankin 61 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rankin vs. the course average
A
−18.1
B
+9.9
C
+11.3
D
−1.7
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
10.3% withdrew · 7 of 68 enrolled.
Hsiang-Wen Hsu 51 grades · 1 term 2.47GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A
−12.7
B
−5.0
C
+3.4
D
+12.9
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 2 of 53 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.40
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.27
Reflection4.32
Respect4.60
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.32
Questions4.47
Matthew Heyrich 45 reported responses 3.43Eval / 5
Overall3.43 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.50
Contribution2.50
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.70
Questions3.80
Manuel Angel Rodriguez Iii 42 reported responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.50
Contribution2.60
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.40
Reflection3.40
Respect3.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Gabriella Seifert 23 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Christopher Pochas 6 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.