Course record PHYS
PHYS 1230
Light and Color for Nonscientists
University of Colorado Boulder
661 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Noah D Finkelstein 133 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
133 letter grades
Compare with the course
Finkelstein vs. the course average
A
+12.3
B
−5.6
C
−0.1
D
−2.3
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 7 of 140 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Tyler C Mcmaken 33 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcmaken vs. the course average
A
+19.6
B
−13.7
C
−5.3
D
+0.8
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Stephen R Wagner 41 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wagner vs. the course average
A
−0.7
B
+11.4
C
−4.0
D
−2.3
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 3 of 44 enrolled.
Overall2.74 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.10
Technology2.60
Synthesis2.30
Collaboration1.80
Connection3.20
Contribution1.80
Discussion2.40
Inclusivity1.60
Grading3.20
Reflection2.80
Respect3.50
Creativity2.70
Feedback2.10
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.10
Sasha Mark Novack 169 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
169 letter grades
Compare with the course
Novack vs. the course average
A
+6.8
B
−4.2
C
−1.9
D
−1.7
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 8 of 177 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Joseph E Maclennan 139 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
139 letter grades
Compare with the course
Maclennan vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+8.2
C
−3.4
D
−0.8
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
7.9% withdrew · 12 of 151 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.57
Synthesis3.36
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.39
Contribution3.52
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.07
Grading3.18
Reflection3.75
Respect4.22
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.93
Questions3.74
Bethany R Wilcox 69 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wilcox vs. the course average
A
−15.2
B
+4.2
C
+4.6
D
+3.5
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
10.4% withdrew · 8 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Sarah Emily Stephens 77 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stephens vs. the course average
A
−18.5
B
+0.1
C
+10.7
D
+6.8
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 2 of 79 enrolled.
Julian Gifford 4 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Andrew Daniel Bradfield 18 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Thomas M Horning 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.