Course record PHYS
PHYS 1140
Experimental Physics 1
University of Colorado Boulder
4,658 grades133 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Mihaly Horanyi 1,163 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
1,163 letter grades
Compare with the course
Horanyi vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−4.2
C
−1.6
D
−0.9
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 25 of 1,188 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
739 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.35
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.27
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.19
Questions4.27
Gang Cao 495 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
495 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cao vs. the course average
A
+4.9
B
−1.9
C
−2.0
D
−0.8
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 12 of 507 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.25
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.95
Questions4.15
Tobin Leo Munsat 415 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
415 letter grades
Compare with the course
Munsat vs. the course average
A
−5.3
B
+4.3
C
+2.4
D
−0.3
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 15 of 430 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.43
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.17
Reflection4.20
Respect4.47
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.93
Questions4.20
Eric Cornell 1,145 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
1,145 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cornell vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+3.0
C
same
D
+0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 26 of 1,171 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
129 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.53
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.17
Reflection4.47
Respect4.73
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.43
Questions4.53
Heather Jean Lewandowski 1,440 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
1,440 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lewandowski vs. the course average
A
−3.0
B
+0.4
C
+1.2
D
+0.7
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 56 of 1,496 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
823 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.34
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.32
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.04
Inclusivity3.42
Grading3.81
Reflection4.23
Respect4.60
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.81
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.09
Questions4.13
John Wilson 15 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Nanako Shitara 15 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
David Chaparro 48 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.41
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.65
Reflection4.64
Respect4.77
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.55
Questions4.87
Noah Lordi 31 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.68
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.67
Reflection4.63
Respect4.97
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.92
Thanmay Sunil Menon 10 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.