Course record PHYS

PHYS 1140

Experimental Physics 1

University of Colorado Boulder

4,658 grades133 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record

Professors 133 of 133

Mihaly Horanyi 1,163 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
84.3% A
12.2% B
2.2% C
0.1% D
1.2% F

1,163 letter grades

Compare with the course
Horanyi vs. the course average
A +6.9
B −4.2
C −1.6
D −0.9
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 25 of 1,188 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Gang Cao 495 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
82.2% A
14.5% B
1.8% C
0.2% D
1.2% F

495 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cao vs. the course average
A +4.9
B −1.9
C −2.0
D −0.8
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.4% withdrew · 12 of 507 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Tobin Leo Munsat 415 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
72.0% A
20.7% B
6.3% C
0.7% D
0.2% F

415 letter grades

Compare with the course
Munsat vs. the course average
A −5.3
B +4.3
C +2.4
D −0.3
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 15 of 430 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Eric Cornell 1,145 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
73.8% A
19.4% B
3.8% C
1.6% D
1.4% F

1,145 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cornell vs. the course average
A −3.5
B +3.0
C same
D +0.5
F same

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 26 of 1,171 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Heather Jean Lewandowski 1,440 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
74.4% A
16.8% B
5.1% C
1.7% D
2.0% F

1,440 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lewandowski vs. the course average
A −3.0
B +0.4
C +1.2
D +0.7
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 56 of 1,496 enrolled.

Open full professor record
John Wilson 15 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Nanako Shitara 15 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
David Chaparro 48 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.41
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.65
Reflection4.64
Respect4.77
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.55
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Noah Lordi 31 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.68
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.67
Reflection4.63
Respect4.97
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Thanmay Sunil Menon 10 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
James William Erikson 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Arvind Jayashankara Aradhya 12 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.95
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Edwin Camilo Chaparro 2 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Nikolay Yegovtsev 24 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.48
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.92
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.86
Reflection4.29
Respect4.28
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.26
Questions4.49
Open full professor record
Evan Wynn Wickenden 39 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.95
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.06
Reflection4.79
Respect4.86
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.71
Questions4.69
Open full professor record
Ingrid Zimmermann 44 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.75
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.03
Reflection4.21
Respect4.89
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.58
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Owen Tower 22 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.28
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.19
Respect4.89
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.36
Questions4.98
Open full professor record
Trystan Raymond Smith 9 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.55
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.45
Reflection4.25
Respect4.25
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Carter Patterson 31 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.38
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.61
Grading4.02
Reflection4.51
Respect4.59
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.44
Questions4.56
Open full professor record
John R Pitten 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.85
Reflection4.45
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Kinfung Ngan 8 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Haoqing Zhang 11 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.40
Contribution4.45
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity2.85
Grading3.25
Reflection3.70
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.80
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.05
Questions3.65
Open full professor record
Wei Mao 19 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.03
Contribution4.70
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.43
Reflection3.83
Respect4.57
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.77
Challenge3.73
Questions4.23
Open full professor record
Shunjie Han 12 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.45
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.50
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Daniel Glenn Steckhahn 32 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.08
Reflection4.30
Respect4.72
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.48
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Mengyu Wu 7 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.86
Connection3.86
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.72
Grading4.46
Reflection4.12
Respect3.76
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.83
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Yan Jin 9 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.15
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.55
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge3.85
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Tanner Grogan 11 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.85
Grading3.70
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Andrew Osborne 15 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.10
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.70
Reflection3.93
Respect4.93
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.07
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.03
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Koushik Ganesan 8 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.65
Reflection4.25
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nicholas Paul Pellatz 8 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology3.45
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Sina G Lewis 9 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Yijian Cai 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Hongda Wang 9 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.75
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.65
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.55
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Michael Joseph Schefferstein 38 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.26
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.82
Reflection4.84
Respect4.26
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.65
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Yilun Song 4 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Sankalp Gaur 32 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.18
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.02
Reflection4.64
Respect4.67
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.23
Questions4.64
Open full professor record
Aseem Milind Visal 19 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.48
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.95
Reflection4.36
Respect4.78
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.24
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Colin G West 230 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

230 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.26
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.31
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.42
Grading3.86
Reflection4.23
Respect4.47
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.16
Questions4.03
Open full professor record
Emma Nelson 14 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.05
Reflection4.15
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.05
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Killian N Dickson 10 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Trevor Geerdts 28 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.37
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.02
Reflection4.43
Respect4.71
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.81
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Caitlin Ellen Cash 34 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.71
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.34
Reflection4.63
Respect4.83
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.56
Questions4.74
Open full professor record
Jorge Luis Ramirez Ortiz 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.50
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.81
Reflection4.57
Respect4.96
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.94
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Haixin Liu 14 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.85
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.15
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Yichi Zhang 37 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.59
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.09
Reflection4.63
Respect4.74
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.48
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Zheng Luo 16 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.13
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.43
Reflection4.33
Respect4.67
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Kristin Oliver 19 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.20
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Chaoran Wang 18 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.56
Synthesis3.42
Collaboration3.91
Connection4.00
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity2.96
Grading3.20
Reflection3.95
Respect4.55
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.83
Challenge3.78
Questions4.23
Open full professor record
Manuel Angel Rodriguez Iii 14 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion2.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.75
Reflection3.90
Respect3.20
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.15
Questions3.45
Open full professor record
Bade Sayki 6 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Jackson Wagner 9 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.25
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.90
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Ian Michael Fogarty Florang 30 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.51
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.35
Reflection4.69
Respect4.86
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.78
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Victoria Marie Girgis 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.90
Respect4.65
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Arlo Marquez Grap 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Changda Liu 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Omar J French 9 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.35
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Cai E. Cash 2 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Gracemarie Buehlmann 40 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.16
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.91
Reflection4.36
Respect4.23
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.29
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Charles Hurrell 11 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Hagan Hensley 9 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.25
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Yunhao Li 19 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.52
Contribution4.39
Discussion3.89
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.33
Reflection4.18
Respect3.95
Creativity3.91
Feedback3.12
Interaction4.17
Challenge3.66
Questions4.02
Open full professor record
Justin Copenhaver 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.15
Reflection4.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.00
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Sichong Ma 12 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.46
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.58
Reflection4.42
Respect4.69
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.80
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Jiayi Liu 22 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology3.22
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.86
Connection3.81
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.21
Inclusivity4.09
Grading3.19
Reflection3.36
Respect4.67
Creativity3.28
Feedback3.07
Interaction4.85
Challenge3.50
Questions3.28
Open full professor record
Max Herrmann 7 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.35
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Grzegorz Golba 5 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Phillip Glenn Morgan 18 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.24
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.19
Reflection4.35
Respect4.16
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.21
Questions4.44
Open full professor record
Trevor Kieft 5 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tao Yuan 8 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.25
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.25
Reflection4.35
Respect4.00
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.15
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Braden Larsen 7 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.05
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.60
Reflection3.65
Respect4.55
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.25
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Clay Klein 13 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.05
Reflection4.60
Respect4.35
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Blake Alexander Lee 19 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.55
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.18
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.43
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Aaron Sokolik 10 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.72
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.33
Reflection4.68
Respect4.73
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.22
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Justin Nicoski 18 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.85
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Tobias Gaillard Oliver 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.15
Reflection4.90
Respect4.35
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Lindell Williams 8 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.05
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.25
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Jake Sitison 6 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Fatema Fairooz 22 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.77
Contribution4.25
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity3.39
Grading3.99
Reflection4.27
Respect4.17
Creativity3.34
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.37
Challenge3.57
Questions3.94
Open full professor record
Renee Michelle Gurganus 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Open full professor record
Nathan Mackey 24 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.25
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.76
Reflection4.37
Respect4.96
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nereida Martinez 38 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.64
Reflection4.67
Respect4.73
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.52
Questions4.42
Open full professor record
Xeen Meighan 37 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.62
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.82
Reflection4.57
Respect4.78
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.43
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Cameron Wagner 11 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Marcel Mazur 13 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.42
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.62
Reflection4.23
Respect5.00
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.14
Questions4.98
Open full professor record
Eli Katz 8 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.65
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Wei-Ren Syong 14 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.39
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.30
Reflection4.69
Respect4.80
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.56
Questions4.81
Open full professor record
Curtis Peterson 24 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.35
Reflection4.46
Respect4.54
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.47
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Xiongwei Liu 53 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.35
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.45
Reflection4.22
Respect4.60
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.51
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Daphne Blumin 7 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.50
Reflection3.75
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.65
Questions3.85
Open full professor record
Adam Harris 11 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.72
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.26
Grading4.02
Reflection4.42
Respect4.41
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.15
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Gewei Chen 18 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.47
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.33
Reflection4.45
Respect4.83
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.58
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Emil Pellett 18 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.25
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.12
Reflection3.87
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.02
Questions4.14
Open full professor record
Matthew Fox 20 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.50
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.56
Respect4.77
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.65
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Mert Okyay 10 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Keith White 4 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Zihan Zhang 8 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Shijie Zhong 137 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

137 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.35
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.25
Reflection4.05
Respect4.65
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.95
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Husna Amini 11 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Maxime Pindrys 27 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.53
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.28
Reflection4.52
Respect4.48
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.29
Questions4.48
Open full professor record
Dwaipayan Basu 16 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.55
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.28
Reflection4.69
Respect4.66
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.46
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Joe Radel 10 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.20
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.25
Reflection4.05
Respect4.25
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.80
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Anurag Ranjan 45 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.72
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.56
Reflection4.59
Respect4.82
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Elliot Roberts 17 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.91
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.43
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.66
Reflection4.48
Respect4.92
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kai Zhou 13 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.25
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.29
Grading3.93
Reflection4.37
Respect4.87
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.32
Questions4.81
Open full professor record
Wei-En Tseng 27 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology3.47
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.36
Contribution4.55
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.02
Reflection4.17
Respect4.77
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.42
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Wan Xiong 6 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.15
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Sapan Kumar Sen 11 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.57
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.74
Grading3.92
Reflection4.56
Respect4.30
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.13
Questions4.18
Open full professor record
Matthew Steele 6 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Dario Tringali 6 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.65
Reflection3.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Noah Welikson 26 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.80
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.80
Reflection4.77
Respect4.68
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.77
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Calder Haubrich 11 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Vimal Palanivelrajan 7 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Keita Richardson 9 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Gracemarie Chaos Bueller 8 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.75
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.25
Reflection3.65
Respect3.75
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Joseph Andress 6 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.25
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.65
Contribution4.25
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions3.65
Open full professor record
Haiping Zhang 32 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.46
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.04
Reflection4.52
Respect4.32
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.38
Questions4.33
Open full professor record
Clint Gersabeck 10 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.95
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.05
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.75
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Anish Parulekar 16 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.61
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.65
Reflection4.62
Respect4.71
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.64
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Stephanie Mcnamara 21 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.67
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.67
Reflection4.77
Respect4.92
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
River Alyn Leversee 10 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.59
Synthesis3.22
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.99
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.81
Reflection3.61
Respect4.04
Creativity3.63
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.02
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Zack Sierzega 18 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.92
Technology4.25
Synthesis2.65
Collaboration4.09
Connection2.88
Contribution4.02
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.71
Reflection3.06
Respect4.78
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.21
Questions4.32
Open full professor record
Xinrong Chen 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Jiazheng Li 13 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.56
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.96
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.30
Reflection4.12
Respect4.19
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.34
Challenge3.86
Questions4.48
Open full professor record
Ryan Yik Wah Lau 15 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.45
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Brandon Li 8 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Meredith D Betterton 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Ivan Jane 8 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.15
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Joe Mccarty 6 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Leo Beck 11 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.20
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection3.85
Respect4.05
Creativity3.45
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.95
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Kevin M Stenson 10 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.15
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Kevin Federico 8 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tianrun Wu 5 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.35
Contribution4.85
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.25
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge3.50
Questions3.75
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.