Course record PHYS
PHYS 1120
General Physics 2
University of Colorado Boulder
5,756 grades114 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below averageColin G West 277 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
277 letter grades
Compare with the course
West vs. the course average
A
+6.0
B
+5.0
C
−7.0
D
−2.2
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 6 of 283 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
298 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.38
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.02
Reflection4.49
Respect4.55
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.61
Questions4.40
Michael A Dubson 2,379 grades · 1 term 2.60GPA
2,379 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dubson vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
−3.1
C
+1.6
D
−0.6
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 119 of 2,498 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
762 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.47
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.29
Reflection4.55
Respect4.58
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.67
Questions4.44
Daniel Ryan Bolton 2,999 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
2,999 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bolton vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
+2.3
C
−0.7
D
+0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.1% withdrew · 195 of 3,194 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
1,301 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.43
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.42
Reflection4.56
Respect4.70
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.65
Questions4.63
Dmitry Reznik 101 grades · 1 term 2.10GPA
101 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reznik vs. the course average
A
−8.9
B
−7.7
C
+3.2
D
+4.8
F
+8.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.2% withdrew · 9 of 110 enrolled.
Overall3.15 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.70
Contribution2.70
Discussion2.90
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.20
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.10
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.30
Questions3.40
Zheng Luo 13 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Justin Nicoski 27 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.07
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.70
Reflection4.53
Respect4.77
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Chase Alexander Zagorec-Marks 31 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.53
Connection3.93
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.37
Respect4.60
Creativity3.47
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.33
Questions4.67
Shuo Sun 11 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.30
Questions3.95
Joseph Bush 54 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.94
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.05
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.61
Grading3.90
Reflection4.68
Respect4.77
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.40
Questions4.62
Chao Yin 21 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.30
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.65
Grading2.80
Reflection3.85
Respect4.35
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.75
Questions3.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.