Course record PHYS

PHYS 1120

General Physics 2

University of Colorado Boulder

5,756 grades114 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average

Professors 114 of 114

Colin G West 277 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
27.8% A
36.5% B
31.4% C
2.9% D
1.4% F

277 letter grades

Compare with the course
West vs. the course average
A +6.0
B +5.0
C −7.0
D −2.2
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 6 of 283 enrolled.

Michael A Dubson 2,379 grades · 1 term 2.60GPA
24.1% A
28.3% B
39.9% C
4.4% D
3.2% F

2,379 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dubson vs. the course average
A +2.4
B −3.1
C +1.6
D −0.6
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 119 of 2,498 enrolled.

Daniel Ryan Bolton 2,999 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
19.6% A
33.7% B
37.7% C
5.6% D
3.4% F

2,999 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bolton vs. the course average
A −2.1
B +2.3
C −0.7
D +0.5
F same

Difference in percentage points.

6.1% withdrew · 195 of 3,194 enrolled.

Dmitry Reznik 101 grades · 1 term 2.10GPA
12.9% A
23.8% B
41.6% C
9.9% D
11.9% F

101 letter grades

Compare with the course
Reznik vs. the course average
A −8.9
B −7.7
C +3.2
D +4.8
F +8.5

Difference in percentage points.

8.2% withdrew · 9 of 110 enrolled.

Zheng Luo 13 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Justin Nicoski 27 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.07
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.70
Reflection4.53
Respect4.77
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Chase Alexander Zagorec-Marks 31 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.53
Connection3.93
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.37
Respect4.60
Creativity3.47
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.33
Questions4.67
Shuo Sun 11 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.30
Questions3.95
Joseph Bush 54 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

54 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.94
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.05
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.61
Grading3.90
Reflection4.68
Respect4.77
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.40
Questions4.62
Chao Yin 21 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.30
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.65
Grading2.80
Reflection3.85
Respect4.35
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.75
Questions3.30
Yilun Song 40 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.27
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.27
Grading3.80
Reflection4.23
Respect4.63
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.07
Questions4.23
Zhijing Niu 48 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.91
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.07
Reflection4.45
Respect4.88
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.12
Questions4.71
Robert Voinescu 23 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.03
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity2.74
Grading4.30
Reflection4.38
Respect4.66
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.25
Thanmay Sunil Menon 12 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.83
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.13
Reflection4.33
Respect5.00
Creativity3.73
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.58
Questions4.95
Jinkang Guo 50 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.13
Contribution4.57
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity4.56
Grading3.87
Reflection4.57
Respect4.23
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.79
Challenge3.88
Questions3.84
William Robert Groman 21 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.27
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.13
Reflection4.70
Respect4.83
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Tobias Gaillard Oliver 34 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.12
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity3.02
Grading4.52
Reflection4.66
Respect4.74
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.80
Questions4.88
Xiaoyang Huang 26 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.31
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.00
Reflection4.75
Respect4.55
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.47
Questions4.51
Haixin Liu 17 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.07
Connection3.73
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.57
Grading3.77
Reflection4.00
Respect4.33
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.17
Challenge3.90
Questions3.87
Caitlin Ellen Cash 25 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.60
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.32
Reflection4.68
Respect4.94
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.70
Questions4.82
John Wilson 4 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Lingfeng Yan 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Bojun Zhou 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Carter Patterson 3 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.70
Questions4.70
Pedro Victor Bulhoes Barros Portela De Melo 9 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Yifei Ni 13 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Joseph Nicholas Clement 23 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.37
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.37
Reflection4.77
Respect4.93
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.87
Questions4.77
Omar J French 34 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.30
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.77
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.47
Questions4.73
Victoria Marie Girgis 21 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.83
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.30
Reflection4.13
Respect4.57
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Yifan Liu 8 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.30
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.15
Questions4.65
Sarah Jones 37 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.87
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.77
Questions4.82
Andrew Osborne 11 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.05
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.35
Mengyu Wu 18 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.45
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Lance Randall Koenig 16 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.27
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.30
Reflection4.57
Respect4.80
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Agnieszka Anna Jaron-Becker 5 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect3.50
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.00
Questions3.20
Spencer Jordan Hall 65 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

65 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.38
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.55
Reflection4.66
Respect4.83
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.76
Kaixuan Ji 25 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.77
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.70
Reflection4.17
Respect4.27
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Blake Alexander Lee 29 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.13
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.15
Reflection4.53
Respect4.57
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.58
Questions4.70
Aaron Sokolik 8 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.75
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Daphne Blumin 16 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.60
Reflection4.15
Respect4.75
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.05
Samuel D Aberbook 12 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.65
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Seth Grable 175 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

175 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.53
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.76
Reflection4.72
Respect4.62
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.87
Questions4.70
Gracemarie Buehlmann 51 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.46
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.08
Reflection4.91
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.66
Aiko Kyle 15 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Joey Bush 8 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Thomas Baker 30 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.23
Reflection4.50
Respect4.57
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.33
Questions4.13
Michael Freeman 26 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.23
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.07
Reflection4.47
Respect4.67
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.53
Marcel Mazur 19 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.17
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.97
Grading3.90
Reflection4.77
Respect4.27
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.70
Tristan Rojo 23 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.90
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.13
Reflection4.33
Respect4.53
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Rex Planalp 26 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.30
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.33
Reflection4.53
Respect4.60
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.38
Questions4.83
Isabella Zane 13 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.77
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.93
Reflection3.93
Respect4.73
Creativity3.43
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.93
Questions4.33
Keegan Finger 6 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.10
Reflection5.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Jake Sitison 12 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology2.83
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.10
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.40
Reflection4.13
Respect4.77
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.33
Questions4.83
Edward R Kinney 4 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.50
Contribution3.75
Inclusivity3.67
Reflection4.00
Interaction4.50
Molly Griston 21 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.73
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.33
Reflection4.57
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Sam Liechty 24 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.43
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.37
Reflection4.67
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.73
Nicole Luna 25 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology3.92
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.22
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.43
Reflection4.78
Respect4.55
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Nanako Shitara 15 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.05
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Mert Okyay 34 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.37
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.50
Reflection4.53
Respect4.83
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.83
Jonan-Rohi Plueger 23 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.63
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.57
Reflection4.93
Respect4.97
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Jose Armando Delgado 16 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.25
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.45
Grading3.90
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.45
Questions4.25
Camille Yoke 37 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.20
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.53
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.63
Questions4.77
Tao Yuan 9 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.10
Questions4.90
Ian Michael Fogarty Florang 9 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Jay Hwang 17 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.57
Reflection4.77
Respect4.73
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.93
Questions4.80
Gabriella Seifert 15 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.50
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Stephanie Mcnamara 18 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.23
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.53
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.63
Questions4.70
Emil Pellett 21 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.63
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.63
Reflection4.63
Respect4.50
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Johannes Reinking 74 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

74 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.31
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.18
Reflection4.61
Respect4.59
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.68
Questions4.68
Willie Su 43 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.22
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.18
Reflection4.33
Respect4.61
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.49
Questions4.46
Matteo Wilczak 28 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.67
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.83
Alex Ball 22 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.67
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.73
Reflection4.80
Respect4.73
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.87
Questions4.97
Emma Burton 20 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.20
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.00
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Tyler C Mcmaken 16 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.23
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.70
Questions4.83
Cole Shank 29 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.39
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.37
Reflection4.76
Respect4.87
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.71
Questions4.74
Justin Copenhaver 20 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.47
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.03
Contribution3.97
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity2.97
Grading3.67
Reflection3.77
Respect4.53
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.70
Questions4.07
Nathan Mackey 21 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.67
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.60
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.83
Questions4.87
Max Weiner 15 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.53
Reflection4.70
Respect4.93
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.83
Questions4.87
Jesse Snelling 23 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.47
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.23
Reflection4.77
Respect4.53
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.77
Questions4.60
Ben Mcdonough 30 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.40
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.40
Reflection4.75
Respect4.88
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.78
Questions4.85
Daniel Bernal Rodriguez 19 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.00
Reflection4.33
Respect4.60
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.37
Questions4.40
Jonas Boettner 26 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.30
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.23
Reflection4.73
Respect4.73
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.73
Questions4.80
Clint Gersabeck 25 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.02
Grading3.95
Reflection4.48
Respect4.63
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.58
Andrew Berger 17 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.77
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.30
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.73
Reflection4.47
Respect4.27
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.07
Questions4.17
Xinrong Chen 16 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.55
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.35
Reflection3.85
Respect4.25
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions3.90
Harish Adsule 20 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.17
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.87
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.50
Questions4.87
Jiazheng Li 25 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.40
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.87
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.57
Questions4.50
Katherine Slattery 19 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.67
Reflection4.47
Respect4.63
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.33
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.63
Questions4.57
Joe Mccarty 32 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.95
Reflection4.75
Respect4.48
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.57
Questions4.75
Ben Bobell 30 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.57
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.30
Reflection4.87
Respect4.80
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Yun Ma 20 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.53
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.47
Reflection4.57
Respect4.67
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.57
Alysia Diane Marino 37 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.13
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.11
Reflection4.68
Respect4.77
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.77
Questions4.69
Matthew Steele 58 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.47
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.57
Reflection4.81
Respect4.94
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.87
Questions4.87
Henry Jordan 28 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.67
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.60
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.90
Johnny Gallagher 19 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.23
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.23
Reflection4.73
Respect4.83
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.87
Maxime Pindrys 18 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.43
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.33
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.47
Matthew Fox 17 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.05
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Alex Fix 19 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.44
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.67
Reflection4.82
Respect4.94
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.58
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions4.82
Joshua Friedman 28 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.37
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.30
Reflection4.67
Respect4.77
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.73
Henry Yin 17 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.40
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.57
Reflection4.77
Respect4.77
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.87
Questions4.97
Gabriel Schebel 27 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.30
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.53
Reflection4.77
Respect4.73
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Liam Keeley 17 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.37
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.33
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.83
Questions4.70
Sarah Phillips 27 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.07
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.37
Reflection4.67
Respect4.57
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.77
Tianhao Liu 15 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.95
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Shuyan Zhou 16 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.73
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity2.63
Grading3.43
Reflection4.43
Respect4.37
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.37
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.83
Questions4.23
Prithwiraj Ganguly 18 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.73
Questions4.57
Michael Oconnor 22 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.23
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.37
Reflection4.60
Respect4.77
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.87
Branden Lee Esses 9 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.25
Reflection4.85
Respect4.75
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Yu Fei Liu 17 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.57
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading5.00
Reflection4.83
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Harley Fasullo 20 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.27
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.03
Reflection4.67
Respect4.80
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.93
Noah Schwartz 22 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.58
Reflection4.58
Respect4.58
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.78
Questions4.70
Hexiang Chang 18 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.33
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.93
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.57
Questions4.83
Matthew Everette 16 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.57
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.63
Reflection4.87
Respect4.93
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions5.00
Ya-Wen Chuang 26 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.