Course record PHYS

PHYS 1115

General Physics 1 for Majors

University of Colorado Boulder

442 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 19

Michael Andrew Calkins 97 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
33.0% A
30.9% B
24.7% C
0.0% D
11.3% F

97 letter grades

Compare with the course
Calkins vs. the course average
A +5.8
B +3.1
C −2.0
D −8.4
F +1.4

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 6 of 103 enrolled.

Steven J Pollock 129 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
31.0% A
20.9% B
30.2% C
14.7% D
3.1% F

129 letter grades

Compare with the course
Pollock vs. the course average
A +3.9
B −6.9
C +3.5
D +6.4
F −6.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.4% withdrew · 6 of 135 enrolled.

Michael Dennis Litos 216 grades · 1 term 2.41GPA
22.2% A
30.6% B
25.5% C
8.3% D
13.4% F

216 letter grades

Compare with the course
Litos vs. the course average
A −4.9
B +2.7
C −1.2
D same
F +3.5

Difference in percentage points.

5.3% withdrew · 12 of 228 enrolled.

Tommy Alexander Garcia 75 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

75 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.11
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.80
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.15
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.15
Questions4.30
Daniel Lis 9 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Haoqing Zhang 3 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection1.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.30
Questions4.00
Michael A Dubson 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Trystan Raymond Smith 2 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Mihaly Horanyi 52 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Kaixuan Ji 15 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.40
Grading2.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.70
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.65
Show all 19 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.