Course record PHYS
PHYS 1115
General Physics 1 for Majors
University of Colorado Boulder
442 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work
Michael Andrew Calkins 97 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Calkins vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
+3.1
C
−2.0
D
−8.4
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 6 of 103 enrolled.
Overall3.92 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.72
Technology4.49
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.15
Contribution3.42
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.32
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.02
Questions4.19
Steven J Pollock 129 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
129 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pollock vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
−6.9
C
+3.5
D
+6.4
F
−6.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 6 of 135 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
205 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.38
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.08
Grading4.38
Reflection4.49
Respect4.69
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.69
Questions4.68
Michael Dennis Litos 216 grades · 1 term 2.41GPA
216 letter grades
Compare with the course
Litos vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
+2.7
C
−1.2
D
same
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 12 of 228 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.22
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.52
Questions4.29
Tommy Alexander Garcia 75 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.11
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.80
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.15
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.15
Questions4.30
Daniel Lis 9 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Haoqing Zhang 3 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection1.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.30
Questions4.00
Michael A Dubson 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Trystan Raymond Smith 2 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Mihaly Horanyi 52 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Kaixuan Ji 15 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.40
Grading2.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.70
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.65
Daphne Blumin 14 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology3.25
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.15
Anna Hasenfratz 16 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.55
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.85
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Sam Liechty 12 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.07
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.47
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.73
Questions4.93
Adam Harris 25 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology3.87
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.67
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity2.43
Grading3.73
Reflection4.37
Respect4.97
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.67
Yuan Shi 1 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Eric Zimmerman 33 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology2.90
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.60
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.90
Grading2.80
Reflection4.33
Respect3.60
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.65
Questions3.85
Xiaoyang Huang 20 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.65
Shunjie Han 23 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.10
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Jonas Boettner 49 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.22
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.18
Reflection4.75
Respect4.62
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.68
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.