Course record PHIL
PHIL 3600
Philosophy of Religion
University of Colorado Boulder
209 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Andrew David Chapman 35 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chapman vs. the course average
A
+37.3
B
−23.9
C
−8.6
D
−1.4
F
−3.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Daniel Patrick Kaufman 35 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kaufman vs. the course average
A
−2.7
B
+7.5
C
−2.9
D
+1.4
F
−3.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall3.56 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.80
Questions3.40
Iskra Nikova Fileva 75 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fileva vs. the course average
A
−8.0
B
+14.7
C
−3.3
D
−1.4
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.43 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.10
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.27
Reflection4.59
Respect4.97
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.61
Questions4.97
Stanley Matthew Stolte 32 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stolte vs. the course average
A
+9.2
B
−14.5
C
+3.9
D
+1.7
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.66
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.81
Respect4.70
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.74
Questions4.81
Martin Robert Eyestone 32 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Eyestone vs. the course average
A
−28.3
B
−2.0
C
+16.4
D
+1.7
F
+12.3
Difference in percentage points.
11.1% withdrew · 4 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Caleb M Pickard 20 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.02
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.16
Reflection4.04
Respect3.89
Creativity3.76
Feedback3.16
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.69
Questions4.40
Jonathyn C Zapf 24 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.35
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.82
Reflection4.35
Respect4.92
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.85
Questions4.92
Christopher Charles Heathwood 25 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.