Course record PHIL
PHIL 3430
History of Science: Newton to Einstein
University of Colorado Boulder
498 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Michael J Zerella 68 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zerella vs. the course average
A
+16.5
B
−2.3
C
−10.9
D
−1.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 3 of 71 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
David A Youkey 148 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
148 letter grades
Compare with the course
Youkey vs. the course average
A
+20.4
B
−14.5
C
−3.7
D
−1.9
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 5 of 153 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.41
Connection4.79
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.54
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.72
Questions4.63
Joseph Scott Wilson Jr. Jr. 282 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
282 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
−14.7
B
+8.2
C
+4.6
D
+1.4
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 9 of 291 enrolled.
Stephen Thomas Troy 26 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Joseph Wilson 95 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration2.99
Connection4.64
Contribution4.66
Discussion3.96
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.57
Reflection4.73
Respect4.85
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.72
Questions4.71
Katie Mccabe 10 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Pedro Asmar De Lucas Brea 32 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.05
Contribution4.38
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.39
Reflection4.54
Respect4.78
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.46
Questions4.32
David Mghanga Mwakima 32 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.48
Connection3.58
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.77
Reflection4.17
Respect4.71
Creativity3.69
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.41
Questions4.57
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.