Course record PHIL
PHIL 3410
History of Science: Ancients to Newton
University of Colorado Boulder
502 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below averageDavid A Youkey 295 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
295 letter grades
Compare with the course
Youkey vs. the course average
A
+8.1
B
−3.9
C
−3.7
D
−0.3
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 8 of 303 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.66
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.59
Reflection4.34
Respect4.23
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.61
Questions4.43
Joseph Scott Wilson Jr. Jr. 207 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
207 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
−11.6
B
+5.5
C
+5.2
D
+0.5
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 10 of 217 enrolled.
Cheryl Layne Braden 22 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Benjamin Michael Kultgen 29 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.89
Connection3.96
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.64
Reflection4.16
Respect4.93
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.91
Challenge4.51
Questions4.49
Joseph Wilson 66 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration2.26
Connection4.72
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.98
Reflection4.47
Respect4.77
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.19
Challenge4.34
Questions4.53
Zelda Kieser 21 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Alan G Sumler 11 reported responses 3.24Eval / 5
Overall3.24 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration2.00
Connection3.20
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.90
Reflection3.50
Respect3.70
Creativity2.70
Feedback3.10
Interaction2.00
Challenge3.30
Questions3.90
Owen Henry Forbes 3 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.92
Technology1.92
Synthesis1.92
Collaboration4.50
Connection1.69
Contribution1.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.81
Grading3.46
Reflection1.92
Respect4.50
Creativity2.58
Feedback1.81
Interaction5.00
Challenge1.81
Questions1.92
Robert C Pasnau 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.