Course record PHIL
PHIL 3010
History of Modern Philosophy
University of Colorado Boulder
620 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Andrew David Chapman 37 grades · 1 term 3.89GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chapman vs. the course average
A
+46.7
B
−26.9
C
−15.0
D
−3.2
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Daniel Patrick Kaufman 221 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
221 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kaufman vs. the course average
A
+15.0
B
−4.2
C
−6.0
D
−3.2
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 9 of 230 enrolled.
Overall3.51 / 5
141 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.18
Connection3.90
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.78
Grading3.78
Reflection4.32
Respect4.35
Creativity3.56
Feedback3.68
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.15
Questions3.98
Mark King Boespflug 35 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boespflug vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−6.4
C
+2.1
D
−0.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Garrett Zantow Bredeson 75 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bredeson vs. the course average
A
−11.8
B
+5.0
C
+3.7
D
−0.6
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 3 of 78 enrolled.
Overall4.84 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.68
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.90
Reflection4.98
Respect4.90
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.91
Jason Timothy Potter 220 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
220 letter grades
Compare with the course
Potter vs. the course average
A
−18.3
B
+8.6
C
+5.5
D
+4.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 8 of 228 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology3.59
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.18
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.73
Reflection4.46
Respect4.39
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.33
Questions4.50
Stanley Matthew Stolte 32 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stolte vs. the course average
A
−10.8
B
−3.7
C
+10.0
D
−3.2
F
+7.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.
Overall3.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect3.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.40
Questions4.10
Stephen Thomas Troy 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert C Pasnau 10 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Katie Mccabe 1 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Chuyue Zhu 1 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.