Course record PHIL
PHIL 3000
History of Ancient Philosophy
University of Colorado Boulder
644 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Tyler D Huismann 39 grades · 1 term 3.95GPA
39 letter grades
Compare with the course
Huismann vs. the course average
A
+39.1
B
−28.6
C
−6.2
D
−1.1
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Dominic T. J. Bailey 178 grades · 1 term 3.60GPA
178 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bailey vs. the course average
A
+12.4
B
−7.1
C
−2.8
D
−0.5
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 9 of 187 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.12
Connection4.40
Contribution4.37
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.69
Reflection4.63
Respect4.85
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.39
Interaction3.89
Challenge4.84
Questions4.74
Colin C Smith 74 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+7.8
B
−6.9
C
−2.2
D
+1.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 2 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.73
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.76
Reflection4.91
Respect4.86
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.86
Mi-Kyoung Lee 182 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
182 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
−9.5
B
+11.6
C
−1.8
D
−1.1
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 10 of 192 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.68
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.46
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.82
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.74
Questions4.80
Stanley Matthew Stolte 71 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stolte vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
−8.7
C
+12.1
D
+3.1
F
−1.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 2 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.16
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.21
Reflection4.55
Respect4.25
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.34
Questions4.30
Alexandre Priou 28 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Priou vs. the course average
A
−33.4
B
+29.5
C
+8.1
D
−1.1
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
12.5% withdrew · 4 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Robert C Pasnau 35 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pasnau vs. the course average
A
−21.2
B
+14.5
C
+2.4
D
−1.1
F
+5.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology3.71
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.36
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.66
Reflection4.72
Respect4.82
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.68
Questions4.79
Tristan Rogers 37 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rogers vs. the course average
A
−15.1
B
+1.2
C
+1.9
D
+1.6
F
+10.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 2 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.34
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.95
Reflection4.80
Respect4.82
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Brittany Lena Vessely 14 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Ethan Chapman 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.