Course record PHIL
PHIL 2440
Symbolic Logic
University of Colorado Boulder
609 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Colin C Smith 36 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+9.7
B
+3.7
C
−4.1
D
−0.8
F
−8.4
Difference in percentage points.
10.0% withdrew · 4 of 40 enrolled.
Edward Barnett Shear 72 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Shear vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−3.3
C
−2.8
D
−0.8
F
−5.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 5 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.22
Connection3.67
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.42
Reflection4.27
Respect4.74
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.82
Questions4.67
Dominic T. J. Bailey 143 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
143 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bailey vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
+5.9
C
−2.0
D
−3.6
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
12.3% withdrew · 20 of 163 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.24
Connection4.15
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.17
Reflection4.39
Respect4.93
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.83
Questions4.67
Graham James Oddie 63 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
63 letter grades
Compare with the course
Oddie vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−5.5
C
+1.8
D
+1.1
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
12.5% withdrew · 9 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Daniel Immerman 31 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Immerman vs. the course average
A
−5.8
B
+1.2
C
+3.6
D
−0.4
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
16.2% withdrew · 6 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert D Rupert 28 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rupert vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+7.2
C
+5.4
D
+3.5
F
−4.8
Difference in percentage points.
12.5% withdrew · 4 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.88 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Raul Saucedo Ceballos 236 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
236 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ceballos vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
−2.7
C
+1.1
D
+1.9
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
10.9% withdrew · 29 of 265 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.43
Connection3.89
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.48
Reflection4.47
Respect4.81
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.72
Questions4.85
Jonathyn C Zapf 27 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration2.95
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Kieran Britt 12 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Owen Henry Forbes 32 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.45
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.